Sunday, January 20, 2008

The Economics of Love

From a combination of economics theory, love, relationship failures and success stories, I came up with quite a simple theory that finds a connection between attention and attraction..

It's called "The Economics of Love". And here what it's all about..

My theory says that Attraction works more of like a "price", and attention works more of like the "quantity of goods available". Let's say our example is a girl and her name is Siti. Being the only person with the name Siti who has her own unique personality traits that defines herself, she can then declare that she's the world's only supplier of brand-name "Siti's Attention", thus making her a monopoly in the market since her product is unique. Now, "Siti's Attention" is always produced under her own control and conscience..

Now let's get a typical guy's name to be Siti's partner. Let's just name him Ali.. Since he is Siti's partner, thus we can assume that Ali is the target audience (or the market consumers) of the product called "Siti's Attention".

Would you agree with me if I say this -- If "Siti's Attention" is produced in huge numbers every single day, in amounts that far exceeds what Ali can consume every day, flooding Ali's mind, time and energy, thus the price to get one unit of "Siti's Attention" has now decreased...

This is the reason why -- If Ali can earn something like "Siti's Attention" all the time without having to put hardly any effort, then the price of "Siti's Attention" will drop. "Siti's Attention" has now become less in value. And the market surely doesn't crave for something that's easy to get.

Being a monopoly, how can Siti increase the price of "Siti's Attention"? -- The answer is by controlling the supply. Siti needs to produce a smaller amount (or just the right amount) of "Siti's Attention" for Ali so that the price of "Siti's Attention" will go back to the appropriate level. As the availability of "Siti's Attention" is lower (and harder to obtain), it's price will increase. With this, Ali will become more attracted to it (Ever wonder why people are much more attracted to a Mercedes than a Kancil?)

If you ask me if it also works the other way around (A girl and A guy's attention) -- I believe it does..

So, what have we learned here? Take this example and see if we have been pouring too much attention towards our partners. If some of you are doing this, notice if your partner is "suffocating" a little bit or not. If he/she is "suffocating", then you might have been producing too much Attention for him/her. The price of your attention has gone down. He/she doesn't have to do much effort to get attention from you. You definitely need to stop the "suffocation" immediately before your actions will cause him/her to start losing the attraction that your partner once had towards you before..

Leaning back, taking your own time and doing your own stuff will really help. This projects security and confidence (which are really attractive to just about anyone). Plus, by paying less attention (or giving just the right amount of it) towards your partner, it will give the other person the chance to think about you and miss you when you're not around. This really makes the relationship healthy because both people will have to put at least some effort to get each other's attention (there is BALANCE)..

But how can we know how much is TOO much of attention? Well, I should say that any amount of attention would be good, as long as we're not at the level of being clingy and needy.. Why? Because being clingy and needy indirectly projects insecurity..

So, if your partner seems to be suffocated by you clinging around all the time, then you probably want to give him/her some space to breathe by starting to do your own stuff. If there's no third person in the picture, then it is definitely not their fault that they now feel less interested to talk to you. Most probably you were the one to be blamed.

Now, I'm sure there are also other factors that comes into play when we talk about relationships and love, but what I'm trying to explain here is just the connection between Attention and Attraction.. Plus, this law might not be applicable to married couples due to the change in the relationship's dynamics..

To wrap up, I'd like to rephrase this theory into one line:

"In a pre-marital relationship, given that everything else is constant, if Partner X's projected Attention increases to the level of "clinginess"/"suffocation", Partner Y (the receiver) will start to feel less of Attraction towards Partner X.."

Now, do you agree with this theory? Or you have another way of explaining it? What's your personal opinion? I sure would appreciate to hear from you..

Til my next post, Cheers..

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

oh my. you do put your knowledge of economics into practice dont you? heh.

in economics, such things like externalities exists, so, even in the economics of love, such things stands true.

not only does it depend on the supply of 'Siti's attention', it also depends on such externalities be it positive or negative.

if not, market failure will occur = end of relationship.

:D

Anonymous said...

Nice thought Izzat.

If we could package this theory of `The Economics of Love' and sell it to people then we can make some money, and when we have more money our demand (attractiveness) curve will shift to the right and the equilibrium price(our attraction) will increase. If we can make ourself a millionaire out of this business, only a foolish girl would feel suffocated with an increased amount of attention given to her. And by the time our cash inflow could afford us to buy anything in this world it will be a good economic decision to end the relationship as the opportunity cost of getting hotter girls in town increases with the amount of time you cling with your old girlfriend.

Our Malay ancestors knew exactly how to put it implicitly, and sublimely: 'kumbang bukan seekor, bunga bukan sekuntum'.

Anonymous said...

an, please don't give him ideas ok. grrr...

Anonymous said...

izzat, don't listen to an's idea on this.. tsk tsk tsk.

Anonymous said...

nah. it wont sell, wuts this from? maxim? fhm? or is it cosmo? wait, i think its from 'double ur dating tips' by david de angelo, again?? desperados....n claiming them urs? u gotta start writing ur own post mate, authentic for once

Anonymous said...

hey mr. anonymous.. did u get your panties in a twist? ah come on.. don't be so rude. if u have nothing good to say, just shut it ok. u know what, i think u are the desperado here. desperate for attention.. if u really are that desperate, put your name instead of anonymous in the future. i'm sure people will start noticing u then.

izzat, i think you're doing a great job.

Izzat Nizam said...

nash, thanks for your comment.. yep, i'm taking an econs class now and it just came to me the other day.. i found out love and economics do actually have something in common (to me, at least).. lol.. see, my mind drifts away constantly when i'm in class...

as for an, brilliant idea.. hahaha.. as always, you'll go to extremes in your examples until they don't make much sense anymore... simply genius..

and last but not least -- nutcracker, thanks for appreciating my work.. ;)

Fikri Saleh said...

Hi Ijat. Tibe2 rase nak comment :)

Human nature itself craves challenges. These challenges are what makes life interesting. For example, if a guy approaches a girl, straight away the girl respon baek, the girl doesn't jual mahal etc, I can say for sure that the guy will be bored easily. I mean, where's the challenge right?

Anonymous said...

well mis nutcracker, its only the truth, check the facts, google them, u shall see...